Skip to content
FOR FLOCK'S SAKE

Oregon

Snapshot · 2026-10-12

542

reported license-plate cameras in Oregon (#38 of 51)

Local decisions tracked

9

entries in the DeFlock The USA Cancellation Tracker tracker (retrieved 2026-10-11)

City files

13

Oregon places with a city page

Trend: our daily history for Oregon starts 2026-10-12. A chart appears after the second daily snapshot.

Oregon ALPR law

ORS § __. ___ [Added by 2026 c. 77 § 4 to 9]

Before deploying or using an ALPR, law enforcement agencies must establish and publish policies and procedures for the use of an ALPR and the use, storage, and retention of captured data. Policies must include requirements for system and data security, access controls, hot list of accuracy, authorized user training, data retention and destruction, audit processes, and prohibition on use that would violate state law. Law enforcement agencies may only use ALPR systems for specified purposes including identifying vehicles used in crimes, vehicles registered to persons with outstanding warrants, vehicles associated with missing persons, uninsured vehicles, unregistered vehicles, parking regulation and access control. Data not related to court proceedings or ongoing investigations must be retained for no more than 30 days, while data related to court proceedings or investigations may be retained for the same period as other evidence. Agencies may compare data only with specified databases including Department of Transportation records, NCIC databases, Law Enforcement Data System, FBI records, and hot lists that are frequently updated. Officers must include specific information in search entry logs including authorized user identifiers, employing agency, search inputs, date and time, case numbers, law enforcement purpose, and crime type if applicable. Officers must visually confirm vehicle characteristics to match alerts before conducting traffic stops based on automated alerts. Law enforcement agencies may not provide access to data to any governmental entity or agency not created pursuant to the Oregon Constitution or state laws except under specified circumstances. Contracts with third party vendors must specify that data is the agency's property and not owned by the vendor, vendor access requests including warrants and subpoenas must be directed exclusively to the law enforcement agency, data must be encrypted using end-to-end encryption, vendor must comply with FBI Criminal Justice Information Services Security Policy, and vendor may be held liable for misuse or improper release of captured license plate data. Requires a vendor audit process. Prohibits vendors from accessing, disclosing, selling, sharing or otherwise using data. Creates a civil action for an individual to sue the vendor if data is disclosed, shared, sold, etc. Provides exceptions for existing contracts for ALPR systems and makes the law applicable upon the expiration of the existing contract, prohibits extension or renewal of existing agreements.

Summary quoted from NCSL, Automated License Plate Readers: State Statutes, updated September 28, 2026. Not legal advice; read the statute.

Local decisions in Oregon

  • Aug 2026 · CONTRACT CANCELED

    Josephine County, OR. Reported by DeFlock The USA Cancellation Tracker: Josephine County, OR terminated its Flock Safety contract covering 10 cameras. Cited reasons: Public backlash / Fourth Amendment concerns; Camera vandalism; Community not willing to accept ALPR.

  • Aug 2026 · CONTRACT CANCELED

    Winston, OR. Reported by DeFlock The USA Cancellation Tracker: Winston Police Chief Brandon Sarti told City Council on August 17, 2026 that the department had canceled its Flock contract that day. NR Today reported eight cameras in Douglas County at about $24,000 a year, amid $215,000 in department budget cuts. Sarti said the lieutenant’s retirement plus the cancel should save abo

  • May 2026 · CONTRACT CANCELED

    Albany, OR. Reported by DeFlock The USA Cancellation Tracker: Albany, OR terminated its Flock Safety contract covering 1 cameras. Cited reasons: Public backlash; Federal access / privacy concerns; Early termination fee.

  • Dec 2025 · CONTRACT CANCELED

    Eugene, OR. Reported by DeFlock The USA Cancellation Tracker: The Eugene PD “has identified vulnerabilities” in the Flock system and no longer had confidence in the system" terminated their contract with Flock Safety.

  • Dec 2025 · CONTRACT CANCELED

    Lane County, OR. Reported by DeFlock The USA Cancellation Tracker: Lane County, Oregon suspended their contract with Flock Safety, before their 22 cameras were even installed due to public opposition.

  • Dec 2025 · CONTRACT CANCELED

    Springfield, OR. Reported by DeFlock The USA Cancellation Tracker: Following Eugene's lead, Springfield terminated their contract with Flock Safety, after strong community opposition.

  • Dec 2025 · PAUSED

    Talent, OR. Reported by DeFlock The USA Cancellation Tracker: Talent paused its Flock surveillance camera program amid growing community concerns.

  • Nov 2025 · CAMERAS DEACTIVATED

    Woodburn, OR. Reported by DeFlock The USA Cancellation Tracker: Woodburn, Oregon announced they would pause the use of their Flock system following safety concerns for undocumented residents.

  • Jan 2025 · CAMERAS DEACTIVATED

    Bend, OR. Reported by DeFlock The USA Cancellation Tracker: Bend City Council voted to deactivate and remove their Flock cameras over concerns with Flock's business practices.

City files in Oregon

Act in Oregon

Request records (prefilled for Oregon) · Find a local group · Open the map